We are mapping a heritage ecology of the metropolis of Madrid presented through theories, histories and designs.
We are mapping a heritage ecology of the metropolis of Madrid presented through theories, histories and designs.
No European metropolis can be planned through binary theories that separates city from countryside, culture from nature, past from future. The perspective of ecology has overcome these unproductive divisions and open the territorial design agenda to new questions. Metropolises are now complex urban-rural gradients endowed with multifunctional landscapes with truly hybrid natural-cultural values. These values emerge in the ecological interconnection of environmental, social and economic trends. In this context, we believe that heritage can be a partner for ecologising our territory in a new metropolitan agenda. To look at this opportunity, we are mapping the Metropolitan Region of Madrid, the ensemble of its everyday landscapes, as well as its unique and degraded landscapes. Using large spatial databases and our own fieldwork in three mapping work packages (MWP), critical mapping allows us to represent theories, histories and designs in an interconnected heritage ecology. At the same time, we will expand the discussion with colleagues researching other European metropolises.
MAPPING INFRASTRUCTURES AND NATURECULTURE VALUES
Conceived as territorial supply and regulation networks, metropolitan infrastructures hide histories. Infrastructure is originally planned and designed, but its current form is often the result of aggregations over time – it needs repairs, extensions or partial replacements, and is rarely completely replaced. Infrastructures often leave spatial traces that explain the functions and shape of our landscapes. Therefore, green, blue or transport infrastructures can become a heritage ecology that project the past into the present and the future. We believe that the natural-cultural values of infrastructures can help us to understand the complexity of our metropolitan landscape, as well as to achieve future quality landscapes.
MAPPING CULTURAL ASSETS AND PROTECTED LANDSCAPES
While natural heritage policies often exclude a real attention to cultural features, cultural heritage policies dismiss nature. Both have led to a spatial configuration of protected and seeming isolated patches. But on the one hand, the landscape of natural parks is the result of traditional human use of resources. On the other hand, historic sites had a strong sense of place and became fundamental patches of territorial structuring in an environmental sense. Based on ecological theories of heritage, we believe that protected patches contribute more to the quality of life if we can integrate them into heritage territorial systems. To this end, new imaginaries of conservation must be envisioned.
MAPPING AGROECOLOGY AND SUPPLY CHANNELS
In our metropolitan territory, a concentric urban-rural gradient is crossed by a geographical gradient that goes from the Sierra de Guadarrama in the northwest to the plain of the Tagus River in the southeast. Here, agricultural draws diversified and sometimes rare patterns. Farming intermingles with the villages and modern urbanization further away from the capital, but also tries to penetrate the capital itself. Moreover, agriculture is present in historical places and is sometimes related to our scientific and technological heritage. We understand agriculture as a vector of patrimonialisation and social and environmental innovation, capable of providing new forms of public spaces and landscapes.
Research team:
In recent decades, heritage discourse has burst into contemporary architectural debate, not so much out of a concern for conservation, but as a source of opportunities for the project. This shift in focus has evolved in parallel with the expansion of the concept of heritage, driven by various international charters and declarations that have broadened its scope to include tangible, intangible, cultural, and social dimensions. In this context, «adaptive reuse» has gained prominence as an intervention strategy, especially since the 1970s with the energy crisis and the repurposing of industrial buildings. Figures such as Giancarlo De Carlo and the Lacaton & Vassal studio have shown how reuse is not simply a technical operation, but a critical attitude that highlights the cultural significance of what exists.
Adaptive reuse is, therefore, a heritage practice that, from its origins in the reuse of building materials from the ancient world to its theoretical consolidation in the 20th century, has played an important role in the redefinition of material resources: during the Middle Ages, the use of Roman structures represented a functional and symbolic strategy of reappropriation; with the arrival of industrialization and the social changes of the 19th century, reflection on heritage became institutionalized, giving rise to normative criteria for intervening in existing structures; and later, throughout the 20th century, the debate diverged: on the one hand, a movement emerged that instrumentalized history as a formal repertoire, and on the other, a more integrative vision developed that advocates for the cultural and social value of the urban fabric. The latter approach is articulated around the concept of «reuse,» understood not as simple recycling, but as a way to activate and keep inherited architecture alive.
Reconstruction of the Theater of Marcellus (above) and a View of the Ruins (below). Jan Goeree, before 1704. Source: The Metropolitan Museum of Art, public domain (Collection API). Available at https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/336083 (Last accessed July 2025)
In this sense, the research project TRAHERE (Train Heritage Reuse) examines the case of post-industrial Madrid on the former terraces of the Manzanares River. This initiative, materialized in the exhibition «Entre río y raíles» (curated in 2022-23 by the author in CentroCentro, Madrid), focuses on studying the city’s urban heritage from a critical and transversal perspective, addressing both built and natural heritage. Through cartography, models, interviews, and documentary analysis, the project proposes a reading of the territory that makes visible the processes of urban transformation, highlighting memory gaps and proposing reuse strategies that are sensitive to current social needs. In this sense, heritage intervention ceases to be an exclusively technical act and becomes a tool of resistance against gentrification and uprooting. It also reviews the traditional model of heritage protection, highlighting its limits and contradictions.
South Gate, next to the Planetarium, in Enrique Tierno Galván Park (Railway Green Corridor, Madrid). Photograph taken by Davide Curatola Soprana for the TRAHERE project (2020).
Through this same approach, the exhibition «Cronocaos» (curated in 2010 with OMA/AMO at the Central Pavilion of the 12th Venice Architecture Biennale) highlights how many current interventions end up emptying protected buildings, retaining only their envelope as superficial decoration. In contrast, initiatives such as the exhibition «Rehabitar en nueve episodios» (curated in 2010 by the Rehabitar group of the Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña at La Arquería de Nuevos Ministerios, Madrid) advocate an approach focused on uses and the transformation of everyday life, without altering the essence of architecture. This paradigm shift entails understanding heritage not as a collection of untouchable objects, but as a dynamic and living system, whose value lies in both the tangible and intangible.
Ultimately, thinking in terms of adaptive reuse today requires a critical and committed attitude, beyond recycling or superficial conservation. It is a practice that articulates sustainability, memory, inclusion, and culture. In an era marked by precariousness, political opportunism, and excessive consumption, adaptive reuse is presented as a post-production strategy that allows us to inhabit the world in a more conscious, supportive, and creative way. Far from representing a nostalgic solution, reuse is a political and cultural act of prime importance in contemporary architectural and urban debate.
Exhibition “Between River and Rails,” at CentroCentro, Madrid (2022-23). Photograph by Lukasz Michalak for CentroCentro (2022).