We are mapping a heritage ecology of the metropolis of Madrid presented through theories, histories and designs.
We are mapping a heritage ecology of the metropolis of Madrid presented through theories, histories and designs.
No European metropolis can be planned through binary theories that separates city from countryside, culture from nature, past from future. The perspective of ecology has overcome these unproductive divisions and open the territorial design agenda to new questions. Metropolises are now complex urban-rural gradients endowed with multifunctional landscapes with truly hybrid natural-cultural values. These values emerge in the ecological interconnection of environmental, social and economic trends. In this context, we believe that heritage can be a partner for ecologising our territory in a new metropolitan agenda. To look at this opportunity, we are mapping the Metropolitan Region of Madrid, the ensemble of its everyday landscapes, as well as its unique and degraded landscapes. Using large spatial databases and our own fieldwork in three mapping work packages (MWP), critical mapping allows us to represent theories, histories and designs in an interconnected heritage ecology. At the same time, we will expand the discussion with colleagues researching other European metropolises.
MAPPING INFRASTRUCTURES AND NATURECULTURE VALUES
Conceived as territorial supply and regulation networks, metropolitan infrastructures hide histories. Infrastructure is originally planned and designed, but its current form is often the result of aggregations over time – it needs repairs, extensions or partial replacements, and is rarely completely replaced. Infrastructures often leave spatial traces that explain the functions and shape of our landscapes. Therefore, green, blue or transport infrastructures can become a heritage ecology that project the past into the present and the future. We believe that the natural-cultural values of infrastructures can help us to understand the complexity of our metropolitan landscape, as well as to achieve future quality landscapes.
MAPPING CULTURAL ASSETS AND PROTECTED LANDSCAPES
While natural heritage policies often exclude a real attention to cultural features, cultural heritage policies dismiss nature. Both have led to a spatial configuration of protected and seeming isolated patches. But on the one hand, the landscape of natural parks is the result of traditional human use of resources. On the other hand, historic sites had a strong sense of place and became fundamental patches of territorial structuring in an environmental sense. Based on ecological theories of heritage, we believe that protected patches contribute more to the quality of life if we can integrate them into heritage territorial systems. To this end, new imaginaries of conservation must be envisioned.
MAPPING AGROECOLOGY AND SUPPLY CHANNELS
In our metropolitan territory, a concentric urban-rural gradient is crossed by a geographical gradient that goes from the Sierra de Guadarrama in the northwest to the plain of the Tagus River in the southeast. Here, agricultural draws diversified and sometimes rare patterns. Farming intermingles with the villages and modern urbanization further away from the capital, but also tries to penetrate the capital itself. Moreover, agriculture is present in historical places and is sometimes related to our scientific and technological heritage. We understand agriculture as a vector of patrimonialisation and social and environmental innovation, capable of providing new forms of public spaces and landscapes.
Research team:
Agricultural research in Spain has undergone a profound transformation since its institutionalisation in the 19th century to its current configuration as a complex and decentralised system. This process has been conditioned by economic, political and technological changes, and has had a clear territorial impact, materialised in networks of institutions, experimental farms, agricultural stations and specialised buildings. Beyond its scientific dimension, this development has generated an important architectural and landscape legacy that constitutes a significant part of the modernisation of the territory and can now be interpreted as scientific and technological heritage.
Following Vernon W. Ruttan’s classification, agricultural research in Western countries evolved from individual initiatives to specialised experimental stations and, finally, to national research systems capable of strategically planning scientific activity. In Spain, this journey resulted in the coexistence and overlap of different institutional models. After initial attempts to integrate universities, experimentation and agricultural extension, the model based on the Ministry of Agriculture was consolidated during much of the 20th century with the creation of the National Institute of Agronomic Research and, later, the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA), without this leading to the disappearance of other actors such as the CSIC or universities.
The 20th century saw the full institutionalisation of agricultural and scientific research in general, with the creation of key bodies such as the Board for the Extension of Studies, the CSIC and the INIA itself, which established a network of research centres nationwide. In the Madrid region, this process left a particularly dense mark, concentrating buildings, campuses, laboratories and experimental farms linked to both state agencies and technical colleges. These infrastructures were not only spaces for scientific production, but also places for landscape and territorial experimentation, where models of agricultural, forestry and productive management were tested and later extended to other regions.
Starting in the 1980s, the decentralisation of the system led to structural change, with powers being transferred to the autonomous communities and the creation of regional agricultural research systems. In the Community of Madrid, this process culminated in the creation of IMIDRA, which integrates a network of farms and centres distributed throughout the region, among which the El Encín farm stands out as a historic enclave of agricultural innovation. In this context, the recent incorporation of scientific and technological heritage into Madrid’s cultural legislation allows these spaces — buildings, landscapes and productive territories — to be recognised as complex heritage systems, whose conservation cannot be limited to the material, but must incorporate the memory of scientific activity and its role in the cultural construction of the contemporary landscape.