We are mapping a heritage ecology of the metropolis of Madrid presented through theories, histories and designs.
We are mapping a heritage ecology of the metropolis of Madrid presented through theories, histories and designs.
No European metropolis can be planned through binary theories that separates city from countryside, culture from nature, past from future. The perspective of ecology has overcome these unproductive divisions and open the territorial design agenda to new questions. Metropolises are now complex urban-rural gradients endowed with multifunctional landscapes with truly hybrid natural-cultural values. These values emerge in the ecological interconnection of environmental, social and economic trends. In this context, we believe that heritage can be a partner for ecologising our territory in a new metropolitan agenda. To look at this opportunity, we are mapping the Metropolitan Region of Madrid, the ensemble of its everyday landscapes, as well as its unique and degraded landscapes. Using large spatial databases and our own fieldwork in three mapping work packages (MWP), critical mapping allows us to represent theories, histories and designs in an interconnected heritage ecology. At the same time, we will expand the discussion with colleagues researching other European metropolises.
MAPPING INFRASTRUCTURES AND NATURECULTURE VALUES
Conceived as territorial supply and regulation networks, metropolitan infrastructures hide histories. Infrastructure is originally planned and designed, but its current form is often the result of aggregations over time – it needs repairs, extensions or partial replacements, and is rarely completely replaced. Infrastructures often leave spatial traces that explain the functions and shape of our landscapes. Therefore, green, blue or transport infrastructures can become a heritage ecology that project the past into the present and the future. We believe that the natural-cultural values of infrastructures can help us to understand the complexity of our metropolitan landscape, as well as to achieve future quality landscapes.
MAPPING CULTURAL ASSETS AND PROTECTED LANDSCAPES
While natural heritage policies often exclude a real attention to cultural features, cultural heritage policies dismiss nature. Both have led to a spatial configuration of protected and seeming isolated patches. But on the one hand, the landscape of natural parks is the result of traditional human use of resources. On the other hand, historic sites had a strong sense of place and became fundamental patches of territorial structuring in an environmental sense. Based on ecological theories of heritage, we believe that protected patches contribute more to the quality of life if we can integrate them into heritage territorial systems. To this end, new imaginaries of conservation must be envisioned.
MAPPING AGROECOLOGY AND SUPPLY CHANNELS
In our metropolitan territory, a concentric urban-rural gradient is crossed by a geographical gradient that goes from the Sierra de Guadarrama in the northwest to the plain of the Tagus River in the southeast. Here, agricultural draws diversified and sometimes rare patterns. Farming intermingles with the villages and modern urbanization further away from the capital, but also tries to penetrate the capital itself. Moreover, agriculture is present in historical places and is sometimes related to our scientific and technological heritage. We understand agriculture as a vector of patrimonialisation and social and environmental innovation, capable of providing new forms of public spaces and landscapes.
Research team:
Casa de Campo is one of the largest urban parks in Europe. Yet it is far more than a recreational space for the people of Madrid. This vast green expanse is a living palimpsest of the city’s history, where layers of culture, biodiversity, and urban life intertwine. With its unique mix of natural and human elements, Casa de Campo becomes a true urban laboratory, an ideal site for exploring landscape dynamics and human interaction. At the heart of this living structure lies a key, yet often overlooked, feature: its hydrographic system.
Thematic maps of Casa de Campo prepared by the author (2024).
Winding quietly for 15 kilometers from west to east, the Meaques stream flows through the park like a hidden vein. Though invisible in everyday life, it silently witnesses the evolving narratives that unfold along its banks. Despite forming part of a well-known territory, the stream and its surroundings have remained largely underexplored in terms of in-depth landscape analysis. This paradox of proximity without deep knowledge makes it a fertile ground for uncovering the subtle emotional, social, and ecological dynamics that emerge through human encounters with nature, especially in the wake of the pandemic. How, then, might we begin to read this elusive and suggestive terrain?
Thematic maps of Casa de Campo prepared by the author (2024).
One promising approach lies in the practice of contemplative walking. As J.R.R. Tolkien once observed, “not all those who wander are lost.” Rooted in the psychogeographic experiments of the Situationist movement, this practice invites a drift through space led not by maps or purpose, but by sensation, emotion, and chance. It reveals forgotten corners and latent meanings embedded in the landscape. Alongside this, the attentive observation of the ordinary opens up a phenomenology of the everyday, allowing us to register small gestures, fleeting encounters, and subtle nonhuman rhythms that shape our presence in the world—moments that usually pass unnoticed, yet deeply structure our experience of place.
Thematic maps of Casa de Campo prepared by the author (2024).
The concepts of the Third Landscape and heterotopia offer further lenses through which to approach the Meaques stream. Gilles Clément’s notion of the Third Landscape draws attention to marginal, unmanaged spaces, zones often dismissed, yet vital to the continuity of biodiversity and ecological resilience. These “forgotten” areas offer not only an alternative vision of urban nature but also reveal how such spaces are culturally valued or disregarded. Michel Foucault’s concept of heterotopia, meanwhile, frames the stream and its parkland as layered, contradictory sites that mirror the tensions of society. The Meaques becomes a liminal space where the urban and the wild intersect, a place of reflection and retreat that is both embedded in the city and quietly apart from it.
Thematic maps of Casa de Campo prepared by the author (2024).
Building on this theoretical foundation, Clara Cernou embarks on an exploration that combines walking, drawing, photography, and mapping to capture the micro-events of everyday life along the stream: rhythms, textures, light and shadow, sound and silence, isolation and community, boundaries and beauty. The result is an affective, multidimensional cartography that merges the physical landscape with the lived experiences and perceptions that shape and animate it.