We are mapping a heritage ecology of the metropolis of Madrid presented through theories, histories and designs.
We are mapping a heritage ecology of the metropolis of Madrid presented through theories, histories and designs.
No European metropolis can be planned through binary theories that separates city from countryside, culture from nature, past from future. The perspective of ecology has overcome these unproductive divisions and open the territorial design agenda to new questions. Metropolises are now complex urban-rural gradients endowed with multifunctional landscapes with truly hybrid natural-cultural values. These values emerge in the ecological interconnection of environmental, social and economic trends. In this context, we believe that heritage can be a partner for ecologising our territory in a new metropolitan agenda. To look at this opportunity, we are mapping the Metropolitan Region of Madrid, the ensemble of its everyday landscapes, as well as its unique and degraded landscapes. Using large spatial databases and our own fieldwork in three mapping work packages (MWP), critical mapping allows us to represent theories, histories and designs in an interconnected heritage ecology. At the same time, we will expand the discussion with colleagues researching other European metropolises.
MAPPING INFRASTRUCTURES AND NATURECULTURE VALUES
Conceived as territorial supply and regulation networks, metropolitan infrastructures hide histories. Infrastructure is originally planned and designed, but its current form is often the result of aggregations over time – it needs repairs, extensions or partial replacements, and is rarely completely replaced. Infrastructures often leave spatial traces that explain the functions and shape of our landscapes. Therefore, green, blue or transport infrastructures can become a heritage ecology that project the past into the present and the future. We believe that the natural-cultural values of infrastructures can help us to understand the complexity of our metropolitan landscape, as well as to achieve future quality landscapes.
MAPPING CULTURAL ASSETS AND PROTECTED LANDSCAPES
While natural heritage policies often exclude a real attention to cultural features, cultural heritage policies dismiss nature. Both have led to a spatial configuration of protected and seeming isolated patches. But on the one hand, the landscape of natural parks is the result of traditional human use of resources. On the other hand, historic sites had a strong sense of place and became fundamental patches of territorial structuring in an environmental sense. Based on ecological theories of heritage, we believe that protected patches contribute more to the quality of life if we can integrate them into heritage territorial systems. To this end, new imaginaries of conservation must be envisioned.
MAPPING AGROECOLOGY AND SUPPLY CHANNELS
In our metropolitan territory, a concentric urban-rural gradient is crossed by a geographical gradient that goes from the Sierra de Guadarrama in the northwest to the plain of the Tagus River in the southeast. Here, agricultural draws diversified and sometimes rare patterns. Farming intermingles with the villages and modern urbanization further away from the capital, but also tries to penetrate the capital itself. Moreover, agriculture is present in historical places and is sometimes related to our scientific and technological heritage. We understand agriculture as a vector of patrimonialisation and social and environmental innovation, capable of providing new forms of public spaces and landscapes.
Research team:
Contemporary artistic practices play a significant role in redefining cultural landscapes shaped by urban expansion, infrastructural transformation, and shifting patterns of everyday life. Rather than producing monumental or closed forms, these practices engage with processes, gestures, and situations that unfold within lived environments. Through their critical and exploratory nature, they reveal spatial narratives that often remain invisible within conventional urban or heritage discourses.
Advertising posters for the three exhibitions held at the CentroCentro cultural space.
Artistic intervention operates as a means of exposing the tensions embedded in ordinary landscapes, including those between permanence and change, visibility and neglect, and use and abandonment. By working at the intersection of spatial experience and social observation, artistic practices challenge dominant representations of territory and foreground alternative ways of understanding place. Meaning emerges not from formal designation, but from interaction, perception, and engagement with everyday contexts.
Photograph from the exhibition ‘Madrid Acuosa’, held at CentroCentro, 2021. Author: Lukasz Michalak.
Walking, observation, and temporary action emerge as key strategies for engaging with space. These approaches privilege time, repetition, and attention to the mundane, allowing landscapes to be understood as dynamic environments shaped by routines, movements, and minor events. Through media such as photography, mapping, performance, and installation, these practices generate forms of representation that resist fixed interpretations and instead invite open, evolving readings of place.
Photograph from the exhibition ‘The City of the Future, from Farm to Table’, held at CentroCentro, 2021. Author: Paula Caballero.
Within the metropolitan context of Madrid, such practices respond to fragmented urban growth and the erosion of shared spatial references. Artistic action becomes a way of reconnecting dispersed territories, everyday routes, and marginal spaces, offering narratives that cut across administrative boundaries and established spatial hierarchies. In this sense, art contributes to constructing forms of spatial cohesion rooted in lived experience rather than in formal planning alone.
Photograph from the exhibition ‘Between River and Rails’, held at CentroCentro, 2022. Author: Lukasz Michalak.
Cultural landscapes thus appear as open and contested processes, continuously shaped by perception, action, and representation. Artistic practices expand the frameworks through which landscapes are recognised and valued, keeping their meanings fluid and responsive to social change. By embracing uncertainty and incompleteness, they reinforce the idea of landscape as a collective and evolving cultural construction rather than a fixed or stabilised entity.