We are mapping a heritage ecology of the metropolis of Madrid presented through theories, histories and designs.
We are mapping a heritage ecology of the metropolis of Madrid presented through theories, histories and designs.
No European metropolis can be planned through binary theories that separates city from countryside, culture from nature, past from future. The perspective of ecology has overcome these unproductive divisions and open the territorial design agenda to new questions. Metropolises are now complex urban-rural gradients endowed with multifunctional landscapes with truly hybrid natural-cultural values. These values emerge in the ecological interconnection of environmental, social and economic trends. In this context, we believe that heritage can be a partner for ecologising our territory in a new metropolitan agenda. To look at this opportunity, we are mapping the Metropolitan Region of Madrid, the ensemble of its everyday landscapes, as well as its unique and degraded landscapes. Using large spatial databases and our own fieldwork in three mapping work packages (MWP), critical mapping allows us to represent theories, histories and designs in an interconnected heritage ecology. At the same time, we will expand the discussion with colleagues researching other European metropolises.
MAPPING INFRASTRUCTURES AND NATURECULTURE VALUES
Conceived as territorial supply and regulation networks, metropolitan infrastructures hide histories. Infrastructure is originally planned and designed, but its current form is often the result of aggregations over time – it needs repairs, extensions or partial replacements, and is rarely completely replaced. Infrastructures often leave spatial traces that explain the functions and shape of our landscapes. Therefore, green, blue or transport infrastructures can become a heritage ecology that project the past into the present and the future. We believe that the natural-cultural values of infrastructures can help us to understand the complexity of our metropolitan landscape, as well as to achieve future quality landscapes.
MAPPING CULTURAL ASSETS AND PROTECTED LANDSCAPES
While natural heritage policies often exclude a real attention to cultural features, cultural heritage policies dismiss nature. Both have led to a spatial configuration of protected and seeming isolated patches. But on the one hand, the landscape of natural parks is the result of traditional human use of resources. On the other hand, historic sites had a strong sense of place and became fundamental patches of territorial structuring in an environmental sense. Based on ecological theories of heritage, we believe that protected patches contribute more to the quality of life if we can integrate them into heritage territorial systems. To this end, new imaginaries of conservation must be envisioned.
MAPPING AGROECOLOGY AND SUPPLY CHANNELS
In our metropolitan territory, a concentric urban-rural gradient is crossed by a geographical gradient that goes from the Sierra de Guadarrama in the northwest to the plain of the Tagus River in the southeast. Here, agricultural draws diversified and sometimes rare patterns. Farming intermingles with the villages and modern urbanization further away from the capital, but also tries to penetrate the capital itself. Moreover, agriculture is present in historical places and is sometimes related to our scientific and technological heritage. We understand agriculture as a vector of patrimonialisation and social and environmental innovation, capable of providing new forms of public spaces and landscapes.
Research team:
Food systems have historically been a structural challenge for large cities, which have had to organize complex networks for food production, storage, transport, and distribution. Although these processes traditionally relied on nearby agricultural landscapes directly linked to urban consumption, industrialization and globalization have diluted this relationship of proximity. However, these productive landscapes retain their own interest today as a fundamental part of understanding contemporary urbanity, especially in the European context, where the landscape is recognized as cultural heritage. In Spanish cities, and particularly in the Madrid region, these areas retain vestiges of a historical rurality closely linked to the city, as well as a strong identity and social dimension linked to the memory of food production.
In recent decades, many of Madrid’s agricultural areas have disappeared or been transformed by urban pressure and territorial specialization associated with large logistics infrastructures. However, there are still areas where agricultural activity coexists with heritage assets and communities that preserve traditional knowledge and practices. Based on cartographic exploration, this research identifies those territories where productive soils coincide with a high density of protected cultural and natural assets. By superimposing heritage and land use maps, and filtering for agricultural, industrial, hydraulic, and railway assets linked to food, complex territorial systems are revealed that can be understood as potential cultural landscapes.
One of the most significant cases identified using this methodology is the area surrounding the Real Acequia del Jarama, a historic hydraulic infrastructure stretching over 70 kilometers that forms the backbone of the Vega Baja del Jarama and is still in operation today. Built between the 17th and 20th centuries on the basis of an original initiative by Philip II, the irrigation canal has sustained a continuous agricultural system for centuries, shaping a unique productive landscape close to the metropolis of Madrid. Along its route, there is a wide range of heritage assets—dams, huts, drainage channels, bridges, mills, farms, and old railway infrastructure—that demonstrate the close relationship between water, agricultural production, food processing, and distribution. This network has made it possible to maintain agricultural activity and preserve a territory that has largely resisted the processes of abandonment and urbanization.
The conservation of the Royal Jarama Irrigation Canal and its associated landscapes can be explained by a two-way relationship between production systems and heritage protection, reinforced since 1994 by its inclusion in the Southeast Regional Park. However, beyond the sum of isolated assets, this territory clearly constitutes a whole that justifies its recognition as a cultural landscape. Understanding the irrigation channel from a comprehensive perspective would ensure active conservation, consistent with the principles of the European Landscape Convention and the National Cultural Landscape Plan, and provide appropriate tools for its management. In this sense, the research not only provides a historical and territorial reading, but also an innovative methodology based on the cross-referencing of geospatial data, capable of identifying productive landscapes with persistent cultural and natural values, contributing to blurring the traditional boundaries between countryside and city, nature and culture.